Analisis Framing Konflik Gaza di Era Informational Society (Studi Komparatif: Kompas.Com dan The Guardian)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33506/jn.v12i1.5773Keywords:
Framing Analysis; Gaza Conflict; Informational Society; Kompas.com; The GuardianAbstract
This study examines the framing differences in reporting the Gaza conflict by Kompas.com and The Guardian from the perspective of the informational society. The research aims to analyze how both media outlets construct the reality of the Gaza conflict and to understand the influence of their positions within the global information network on meaning-making processes. A qualitative approach with content analysis was employed to examine two news articles published on June 3, 2025, concerning the shooting of Gaza civilians during food aid distribution. The analysis was conducted using Robert Entman’s framing model, which consists of four elements: define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgments, and treatment recommendations. The findings reveal that Kompas.com frames the Gaza conflict primarily as a humanitarian tragedy by emphasizing civilian suffering, identifying Israeli military actions as the main cause, and highlighting the need for humanitarian protection and assistance. In contrast, The Guardian frames the incident as part of broader structural issues involving aid distribution systems, blockade policies, and wider geopolitical dynamics. These differences demonstrate that media function not only as channels of information but also as producers of meaning shaped by audience characteristics, socio-political contexts, and their positions within global communication networks.
References
Ahmad, J. (2018). Desain Penelitian Analisis Isi ( Content Analysis ). Jurnal Analisis Isi, 5.
Ahmed, S., & Cho, J. (2019). Framing social conflicts in news coverage and social media : A multicountry comparative study. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518775000
Annisa, P. I. (2025). Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Afif Maulana di Instagram Narasinewsroom. Mukasi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(2), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.54259/mukasi.v4i2.4341
Castells, M. (2007). Communication , Power and Counter-power in the Network Society. International Journal of Communication, 1(June 2006), 238–266.
Castells, M. (2013). Communication Power.
Darme, M. (2024). Konflik Palestina-Israel : Upaya Penghancuran dan Pertahanan yang belum berakhir , 1917-2017. Jurnal Sejarah, 7.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Gitlin, T. (2003). The Whole Word is Watching Mass Media in The Making and Unmakinh of the New Left. University of California Press.
Hasanuddin, F. A. (2022). Analisis Kluster Paparan Selektif dalam Jaringan Informasi Vaksin Covid-19 di Twitter.
Iman, N., Ehsham, A., Fatin, N., Jabar, A., & Yunus, K. (2025). The Israel-Palestine Conflict Coverage in the Mainstream Media: A Systematic Review. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels
Inyegar, S. (1991). Is Anyone Respobsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. University of Chicago Press.
Jasper, J. M. (1997). The Art of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creative in Social Movements. University of Chicago Press.
Knüpfer, C. B. (2018). Framing conflicts in digital and transnational media environments. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635218796381
Lorenzo Tondo, M. A. T. (2025). At Least 27 Palestinians Killed by Israeli Fire At Food Point, Gaza Officials Say. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/03/palestinians-killed-israeli-fire-aid-point-gaza-officials-say?CMP=share_btn_url
Matar, D. (2026). Habitual media : interrogating Western legacy media ’ s complicity in the epistemic ‘ war ’ against Palestinians complicity in the epistemic ‘ war ’ against Palestinians. Third World Quarterly, 47(10), 1988–2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2025.2462787
Mccombs, M. E., & Donald, L. (1992). The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Research : Twenty-Five Years in the Marketplace of Ideas. 3, 58–67.
Muhammad Ainani, F. Y. (2025). Beyond Objectivity-Bias Dichotomy : Media Framing as Soft Power Mechanism in International Conflict. Kajian Jurnalisme, 09(01), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24198/jkj.v9i1.59844 Beyond
Nurhaipah, T., & Ramallah, Z. (2024). Literasi Media dalam Menangkal Informasi Hoaks Jelang Kontestasi Politik 2024. Indonesian Journal of Digital Public Relations (IJDPR), 2(2), 100–111.
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing Analysis : An Approach to News Discourse. 55–75.
Pristiandaru, D. L. (2025). Tentara Israel Tembaki Warga Gaza yang Menunggu Bantuan Pangan, 27 Tewas. Kompas.Com. https://www.kompas.com/global/read/2025/06/03/150300170/tentara-israel-tembaki-warga-gaza-yang-menunggu-bantuan-pangan-27-tewas?utm_source=Various&utm_medium=Referral&utm_campaign=AIML_Widget_Desktop
Robert, M. (1993). Framing : Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication.
Siswanti, N. (2019). Analisis Framing Media: Studi Komparatif Media Online “CNN” dan “Kompas” Terkait Fenomena Kemanusiaan di Al-Aqsa Periode 20-23 Juli 2017. Jurnal Riset Komunikasi (JURKOM), 2, 110–125.
Sulkifly, S. (2020). Analisis Nilai Berita Bencana Tsunami Dan Gempa Di Palu Dan Donggala Di Harian Fajar (Periode September-November 2018). Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Hasanuddin, November 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arsy Hafiidu Tyasepti, Alfina Dwi Maisaroh, Indria Putri Wulandari, Zulfa Alfiatus Salwa, Tasya Alifazahra, Muhammad Danu Winata
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
